Monday, 23 June 2014

Sri Manoj Kumar Panigrahi, the bonafied member of this union has been nominated as the Coach of team India for WORLD YOUTH CHESS championship at Durban ( South Africa ) by the government of india.Sri Panigrahi is the eminent chess coach has also performed as the coach of Indian chess team at Hastings (England) for the same event. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL EMPLOYEES, PURI DIVISIONAL BRANCH WISHES ALL SUCESS TO SRI PANIGRAHI IN THIS EVENT. And we are really proud to have such a dignified member in our association.

                                                              BEST OF LUCK

   Sri Gobinda Chandra Pratihari

                     Secretary NAPE, GR-'C' 
                       Puri Divisional Branch 

Saturday, 21 June 2014

50 paise postcard costs Rs 7 to Postal Department

A postcard which is sold for 50 paise actually costs the government Rs 7, according to an RTI response from the postal department listing the costs incurred by it on such services which are proving to be loss-making propositions for it. 

In the year 2012-13, the per unit revenue earned from the sale of postcards was 50 paise whereas, to keep the service running, the per unit cost came to Rs 7.18, down from Rs 7.50 during 2010-11, the department said in its RTI response. 

Similarly, the printed postcard was bringing a revenue of Rs 6 although the cost incurred on it was Rs 7.19 per unit in the year 2012-13. The RTI query further found that the cost of a letter card was Rs 7.18 per unit whereas the revenue earned from it was Rs 2.50. 

The postal department also incurs a loss in dispatching registered newspapers with the per unit cost for a single dispatch being Rs 10.59 while Rs 20.79 is the cost for sending newspaper bundles. However, the revenue earned is a meagre 59 paise for single and Rs 1.63 for bundled dispatches, the reply said. 

The postal department also said that while insurance is offered at Rs 55.24, its cost was almost three times at Rs 141.82 during 2012-13. Each dispatch of a book packet costs the department Rs 9.51 but the revenue earned by it for every delivery is Rs 2.90. 

Each parcel brings revenue of Rs 40.69 while the cost incurred for sending the same is Rs 46.58. Printed books gave a revenue of Rs 2.90 to the department while the cost of dispatching such material was Rs 12.44, it added. 

The response provided to applicant SC Agrawal said, "It is submitted that no annual profit and loss account is prepared in this section. However, allocation of expenditure and revenue to around 30 services is being maintained every year as an annual costing exercise on the basis of data received from different sections of the directorate."

Source:-The Economic Times

Friday, 20 June 2014

Fresh circular issued by Directorate for processing Naaptol BP-COD article's till 31.08.2014

Mentioned below are few examples which resulted into non-delivery of articles:-
Ø  Non availability of Electronic data of COD articles in Delivery post offices.
Ø  Articles where COD amount mentioned physically on the article and appearing in Electronic data differs. (Difference in the amount appearing on the article and in system).
Ø  The office of Delivery is not configured as e-payment office; or the e-payment is not functioning properly due to connectivity issues.

The solution for all these above issues is provided in the Disaster Recovery Module issued by the Dierctorate.
Ø  For the cases where remittance is still not done by the post offices but the articles have been delivered and payment is collected, remittance to be done via Service Money Order as per the solution provided in the module.
Ø  Articles which are still in postal custody due to data fetching issues can also be processed promptly now.


Wednesday, 18 June 2014


 Core Banking Solution (CBS) is a network of post offices, which enables customers to operate their accounts and avail account related services from any post office. It replaces the existing sanchay post. The difference between sanchay and CBS is very simple. Sanchay Post is a LAN (Local Area Network) based application. CBS on the other hand is a centralized application with internet base. 

          MPKBY agents canvas customers and procure RD business. At present agents are preparing bulk lists either manually or through RD Customer package provided by DOP. 

              As Finacle CBS is implemented in DOP, MPKBY/PRSS agents need to prepare bulk list through Web Portal by using the user name and password. Every MPKBY/PRSS agent will be provided with user name and password.
             Once the agent logons to web portal, all the accounts linked to the particular agent will be displayed. Agents can select multiple accounts by clicking the check box. Search option is also available for selecting the account number with fetch option. Once the accounts are selected, system navigates to the next screen. After completion of the selection, the agent has to select SAVE. The saved accounts will be appeared on the screen. 
               In Cash Mode, if there is no rebate payment or partial default payment, the agent can click on “Pay all saved installments”. 
            If there are default installments, Default fee, if any, will be displayed against the particular account. Suppose if there are three months default, default fee for the 1st defaulted month alone will be displayed. 
            After selecting the accounts, we have to mention the no of total installments (to know default fee or rebate, click the option ‘get rebate & default fee’) and SAVE the same. After clicking on ‘pay all saved installments’, a reference number like C123 will be generated. 
               Agents can take required number of print outs from the “Reports” menu by entering the “Reference Number”. The file can be downloaded either as “PDF” or “XLS”also.

             While adjusting to any changed new scenario, generally we feel nervous. It is quiet natural. At the same time we have to understand that change is inevitable. Our ancestors already proved that Wonders and impossible things are possible because of only two things. They are interest and changing of mindset. 
All the Best : Visit : for latest updates, informations, etc
    Frequently Asked Questions
1.       What is the maximum and minimum number of accounts in the schedule?
Fifty is the maximum and   minimum is one account.
2.       What is the maximum amount of the schedule?
Maximum amount is Ten thousand. And there is no maximum limit for the cheque accounts ie deposits made, through cheques, issued by the customers.
3.       Can the agent give the schedules beyond ten thousand; say 10050- by foregoing the commission for the excess amount?
NO.  Exact ten thousand should be observed.
4.       Is there any restriction in the submission of number of schedules?
No. Any number of schedules may be given in the day. However each schedule should not be beyond ten thousand.
5.       Is it compulsory to get cheques for each deposit?
Yes. However, the agent can accept one cheque for all deposits of the same depositor.
6.       Can the agent mingle the cash and cheque accounts in one schedule?
7.       What about new accounts in the schedule?
New accounts, RD Loan, Repayment of RD Loan should be presented separately.
8.       Can the depositor pay the RD installment directly, even though he paid the previous installment through agent?
Yes.  Any account can be accepted in the finacle by delinking or linking from the agent by obtaining a letter from the depositor.
9.       Will the posting be done automatically, by just generating the list itself?
No. the posting will be completed only after upgrading the schedule at post office by using the agent ID and reference number.
10.    Can the agent modify or delete the generated list?
11.   Is it compulsory to present the generated list to the post office   on the same day itself?
No. Generated schedules   may be submitted to the Post office on any day, but before           the default date.
12.   What is the care, to be taken about password?
The password will be blocked after entering the wrong pass word for ten times. It will be released only by the data migration command centre (DMCC) by raising a request. The password should also be changed with regular intervals of 180 days for security measures.
13.     How can the agent confirm himself about the upgrading of the schedule?
 He can confirm the upgrading by checking the ledger entries of the account in the net portal.
14.   Can the agent take print outs of the previous schedules?
Yes. The agent can take the printouts in the reports menu by entering the reference id of the schedule.
15.   How can the software calculate the rebate on the deposits of the same account, which appears in the two generated lists?
The rebate will be changed by updating the second list and total eligible rebate will be given in the second list itself.
16.   What is the default calculation of the RD accounts?
For this purpose the accounts were segregated two types ie the accounts opened between first and fifteenth   of the month and between 16th and last day of the month. The deposits made beyond the concerned period will be paid with penalty.
17.   Is there any TDS exemption for the schedules of Rs. 5000- & below?
18.   At present schedules, for which agency period is expired, are also being allowed on the basis of collector letter which confirms the extension is under process. Is there the facility in finacle?
NO. Transactions could not be performed by Agents on expiry of Agent License.
19.   Is the PAN card compulsory for opening of SB accounts for agents? Can the agent be allowed with other proof in the place of PAN?
PAN Card is compulsory.  No other proof is allowed.
20.   Is there any change in the present default fee?
Yes. In the finacle software, the default fee for RD account is one rupee for Rs. 100-Dn.
21.   What is the meaning of the term OLD ACCOUNT NUMBER IS NOT ALLOWNED IN CHEQUES?
A new ten digit number, introduced in the place of old account number, should only be used on the cheques.
22.   Is the assals number compulsory in operating the schedule?
No.  The assals number is not compulsory.
23.    How can we see the ledger entries of the account
General details will be  appeared on the display screen. However full details of the account may be found by clicking on the account number.
24.   What is the difference between DSA ID and user id?
Both are same.
25.   What is the meaning of pending, success, failure in generating schedules?
They say the status of the generation of the schedule. However after successful generation of the schedule only, the reference number will be allotted.
26.   What about the commission?
The commission, eligible, will automatically be credited in the SB account of the agent. Hence the Commission should not be deducted from the total amount of the schedules.
27.   Finacle does not allow new accounts in the routine schedules for the first time. Does it mean that the agent will forego the commission for the first month?
No. The commission, for the new accounts also, will automatically be credited into the agent’s SB account.
 Thanks to
Shri. R.V.Raghavarao
System administrator
Ongole HO,  Prakasam Dn.
Vijayawada region, AP
Cell 9440232760

Wednesday, 11 June 2014

25 % Increase in Allowances - No Separate Orders Required

Clarification for additional increment for the officers/officials whose date of increment falls between Feb to Jun 2006 & retired before their DNI in 2006.

DG No. 4-4/2008-PC(Corr) dated 04 June, 2014
Sub: Clarification for additional increment for the officers/officials whose date of increment falls between Feb to Jun 2006 & retired before their DNI in 2006.
            Please refer to this Directorate letter of even No. dated 20 mar 2012 in which DOPT OM BO. 10/02/201-E dated 19 mar 2012 was circulated.
2.         A doubt has been raised by the PAOs & sought clarification on the above subject if the officers/officials whose date of increment falls between Feb to Jun 2006 & retired before their DNI in 2006 are entitled for one additional increment in pre revised scale on 01-01-2006.
3.         The above issue has been examined in consultation with ministry of Finance & clarified vide UO No. 48817/E.III-A/2014 dated 21 May 2014 as under;
4.         “M/o Communications & IT is informed that this Department’s OM No. 10/02/2011-E-A dated 19-03-2012 applicable only to those employees, who were due for increment between February and June 2006. Those officials who were not in service on their due date of next increment are not eligible for one additional increment on 01-01-2006 in terms of this Department’s OM dated 19-03-2012”.
This is for information & further action.
(Surender Kumar)

Assistant General (GDS/PC)

Monday, 9 June 2014

Memorandum to VII CPC on merger of DA with Pay and Interim Relief

Dated: June 3, 2014
Justice Shri Ashok Kumar Mathur,
Seventh Central Pay Commission,
New Delhi
Dear Sir
Sub: Memorandum to VII CPC on merger of DA with Pay and Interim Relief
As was decided in the Preliminary Discussion Meeting, held on 28”‘ May, 2014, with the VII CPC, we submit herewith Memorandum on Merger of Dearness Allowance with Pay and Interim Relief, on behalf of Staff Side, National Council(JCM).
Yours faithfully,
(Shiva Gopal Mishra)
Memorandum to VII CPC on merger of DA with Pay and Interim Relief
National Council (Staff Side)
Joint Consultative Machinery
for Central Government Employees
13-C, Ferozshah Road, New Delhi – 110001
Shiva Gopal Mishra
General Secretary
Dated: June 3, 2014
Justice Shri Ashok Kumar Mathur,
Seventh Central Pay Commission,
New Delhi
Dear Sir
Sub: Memorandum to VII CPC on merger of DA with Pay and Interim Relief
As was decided in the Preliminary Discussion Meeting, held on 28”‘ May, 2014, with the VII CPC, we submit herewith Memorandum on Merger of Dearness Allowance with Pay and Interim Relief, on behalf of Staff Side, National Council(JCM).
Yours faithfully,
(Shiva Gopal Mishra)
Copy to: Ms Meena Agarwal, Secretary, Seventh Central Pay Commission (Government of India), New Delhi, along with a copy of above cited memorandum.
Encl: As above
Copy to: All Constituent Organizations of the NC/JCM(Staff Side), along with a copy of above cited memorandum.
Encl: As above
We solicit the kind reference of the 7th Central Pay Commission to the discussion during the informal interaction the staff side of the National Council had with the Commission on 28.5.2014, when we inter alia raised the issue of merger of Dearness allowance and Interim Relief.
2. Before we dwell upon the issues, it may not be out of place to refer to the evolution of the JCM which later became the negotiating platform for the entirety of Central Government employees and workers It was conceived to bring about a conflict free industrial climate in Civil Service in the wake of the tumultuous experience of an industrial strike action in 1960. The National Council, the apex forum under the three tier system headed by the Cabinet Secretary was empowered to deliberate upon the common issues of the Central Government employees. The Staff Side, National Council, thus became the united voice of the entirety of the Central Government employees on fundamental issues like Wages, Pay Scales, Rate of increment, Dearness compensation and other general allowances.
3. However, over the years, JCM became an ineffective instrument to address the basic issues and demands of the employees. We shall detail the requirements to empower and streamline the functioning of the JCM as a negotiating forum in our Main Memorandum to the Commission.
4. The twin issues viz. Merger of DA and Interim relief had been the subject matter of discussion with the Government when the Staff side was called upon to present their views in the matter of finalization of the terms of reference for the 7th CPC by the Secretary, Personnel, (Department of Personnel and Training) in his capacity as Chairman, Standing Committee, National Council JCM. Though we pleaded for the specific reference of the above two issues, to the 7th CPC, the final 1 version of the terms of reference approved by the Government did not find a place for our views. We have, therefore, been constrained to take recourse to clause 5 in the terms of reference, which enables the Commission to send interim report to the Government.
5. Dearness allowance is considered as a device to protect, to a greater or lesser extent, the real income of wage earners and salaried employees from the effects of rise in prices. As per the vagaries of price fluctuation in the market, the allowances are bound to go up and down. Constant rise in the price level, might bring about a situation whereby the quantum of allowance shall go up. Such a phenomenon of constant increase of prices of commodities gave rise to the demand for merger of Dearness allowances with pay so as to make it pay, rather than an allowance, with all concomitant benefits. A committee to advice the Govt. on the portion of such DA to be treated as pay was appointed on 15th July, 1952 (Resolution No. F6(6)E-II/52). The terms of reference of the Committee was :
“Taking in to consideration the rates of dearness allowance that have been sanctioned to date for Central Govt. servents, and the level at which cost of living index are likely to stabilize in the foreseable future, to recommend the percentage of dearness allowance now given to the Central Govt. servents which should be allowed to be treated as pay for all purposes in future, provided that by doing so the present total pay and dearness allowance is not enhanced:”
6. The said committee was headed by Shri N.V. Gadgil, Member of Parliament. The Committee in its report concluded that
“We have recorded the various reasons which we have taken into account in arriving at the conclusion that the appropriate level below which the All India cost of living index is not likely to fall, should be taken as 265-284. We find that for the index figure of 265, the Central Pay Commission formula allows Govt. Employees in the lowest pay group a dearness allowance of Rs.20/- and this amount remain unchanged until the cost of living index go above the index of the next level i.e. 285. We, therefore, consider that the employees in this pay group, a sum of Rs. 20/- which represents 50% of the present dearness allowance of Rs. 40 per month should be treated as pay (page 22 chapter V Report of the Dearness allowance Committee).”
7. The Committee also enumerated in their report the purposes for which the DA shall be treated as pay as under:-
Retirement Benefits
Travelling allowance
Compensatory allowance
House rent allowance
Compensation of Leave Salary etc.
8. The 3rd CPC, whose recommendations were implemented with effect from 1.1.1973 had no reference from the Govt. on the question of merger of DA. Still while dealing with the issue of Dearness allowance (vol.IV – Page 1 Ch.55) the Commission noted that “no other country in the world (except Ceylon and Pakistan) seems to be following the practice of paying dearness allowance or cost of living allowance as a separate element of wage. In most of the countries compensation to Govt. employees for the increase in the price level is given by way of periodical salary revisions Prior to the setting up of the 3rd CPC, pursuant to the discussion in the National Council, JCM, the entire dearness allowance as on 1.8.1966 was treated as Dearness pay and the consequent increase in allowance was granted by the Government with effect from 1.12.1968. In para 16, the Commission recommended that should the price level rise above twelve monthly index of 272 ( 1960=100) the Government should review the position and decide whether the Dearness allowance Scheme should be extended further or the pay scale themselves should be revised. ( Page 4 Chapter 55. Vol. 4 3 rd CPC report). On crossing the index point of 272, the Government conceded the demand for merger of 36% of DA with pay. Later, based on an agreement reached at the National Council JCM the DA granted upto the index level of 320 points i.e. 60% of the Basic Pay was merged through executive instructions for purpose of allowances and pension. Before the 4th CPC was set up in 1983, the issue of further merger of DA with Pay was raised by the employees. Conceding the demand the Government decided that DA entitled to be drawn upto the index average of 568 points be treated as pay for all purposes.
9. Since the Pay Scales were to be constructed with reference to the consumer price index as on the date of revision, every Commission had to perforce merge the entire DA when the actual revision was made. The DA on such revised pay is to be computed on the basis of annual average rise of index after every six months interval. Therefore, the question of merger of DA again rose at the time of negotiation with the Government for setting up the 5th CPC. An agreement was reached on merger of certain percentage of DA and interim relief. (Rs. 100/-) in September, 1993. In April, 1994, the Government issued notification setting up the 5 th CPC (resolution No. 5(12)E-III/93 dated 9.4.1994).
10. The Staff Side placed before the 5th CPC the necessity to merge DA with Pay at an index level below which prices were not likely to move downwards. Pointing out that in the last two decades i.e. 1980s and 1990s there had been not a single occasion when the annual average index had fallen consequent upon which the DA rates were to be reduced, they requested the Commission to merge the entire DA which had been at 97% of the Basic pay as on 1.7. 1993. (The AICPI index being 1201.66). The Commission after deliberations on the memorandum and discussion with the staff Side, recommended that 97% of Basic Pay as DA admissible from. 1.7. 1993 be treated as Pay for all purposes. However, they suggested that the said merger might be given effect only from 1.4. 1995.
11.The 5th CPC submitted its final report to the Government on 19th January, 1997. Before the Commission, the Staff side had demanded that as and when the consumer price index exceeds 25% of the base index at which the pay is fixed that proportion of Dearness allowance should be treated as Pay for all purposes and the decision on this must not be left at the discretion of the Government. The Commission considering this demand observed that:
“From the past trend of CPI given in annexure 11’8.1 it is observed that 50% increase in prices generally takes around five years to materialise. A mid-term quinquennial revision of salaries of the Government employees is not something the Government should grudge. In view of the above, we recommend that DA should be converted into Dearness Pay each time the CPI increases by 50% over the base index used by the last Pay Commission. Such DA should be termed as Dearness Pay and be counted for all purposes including retirement benefits. (Chapter 105 page 157)”. The 5th CPC thus regularised the periodical merger of DA into a well thought 11. out scheme. They also established that wage revision is needed either when the DA exceeds 50% over the base index or after five years .
12. The Government, however, did not act upon this recommendation, when the percentage of DA exceeded 50( 52%) as on 1.7.2002, though it had accepted the recommendation in 1997. With the persistent persuasion, ultimately, the Government issued orders treating 50% DA as Dearness Pay for all purposes with effect from.1.4.2004.
13. Even though the 5th CPC had brought about a finality on the approach to the question of merger of DA with pay, the 6th CPC reopened the issue afresh. The Commission made the following observation-
“This conversion (merger of DA with Pay) is however not necessary in the revised structure being recommended where increments are payable as a percentage of Pay in the Pay Band and Grade Pay thereon and provision has been made for all allowances/benefits to be revised periodically, linked to the increase in the price index. The Commission is, therefore, not recommending merger of DA with Basic pay at any stage.”
14. The 3rd, 4th and 5th Central Pay Commissions had approvingly endorsed the recommendations made by Gadgil Committee in 1952. The practice of periodical merger had been followed as a device to protect the erosion in the real value of wages (including allowances) especially at the lowest level of employees. This erosion becomes unbearable when DA crosses over 50%. To say that the increment rate which is presently 3% of pay would take care of the erosion is to say the least, atrocious. Increment is granted as a legitimate reward for the service rendered by an employee for a year. It has nothing to do with the erosion in the real value of wages. No doubt, the 6th CPC has recommended that a few allowances should be revised by 25% as and when the DA crosses over the stipulated 50%. Such allowances are very in number. Moreover, 25% rise as a compensation when the DA itself rises to 50% is arbitrary and conceived to compensate the worker with lesser amount than what he is entitled to.
15. We, therefore, strongly plead before the Commission, for the reasons enumerated in the foregoing paras, that the Dearness allowance as on 1.1.2014 which stood at 100% may be recommended to be merged and treated as Dearness Pay for grant of all benefits, allowances, pension and other retirement entitlements.
16. We further submit that Merger of D.A. as on 1.1.2014 may also be recommended in respect of pensioners and Gramin Dak Sewaks of Postal Departments.
Barring the 6th Central Pay Commission, all other Commissions had recommended grant of Interim Relief to the Central Government Employees. As per the 5thCPC, Interim relief represented a provisional arrangement during the period between setting up of a Pay Commission and submission of a report by the Commission and its acceptance by the Government. Most of the earlier Commissions with the exception of Ist and 6th Central Pay Commission had taken 2-3 years and sometimes more to finalise their recommendations. Despite the specific reference made to the 6th CPC, by the Government to consider grant of Interim Relief the Commission took the position that having decided to submit its recommendation within the stipulated period of eighteen months and having arrived at a view that its recommendations must be effective from 1.1.2006, it shall not waste time on the question of interim relief. What the 6th CPC failed to appreciate was the erosion in the real value of wages that had taken place over the years due to inflation and rise in prices of essential commodities and the inability especially of the employees at the lower level to make the both ends meet with the available wages. No doubt, the employees had been to some extent benefitted by the decision of the Government to merge 50% Dearness allowance and treat it as pay for all purposes including DA thereon.
2. Every Pay Commission which had recommended Interim Relief had made it amply clear that it was intended to provide some relief to the employees pending a comprehensive determination of their salary structure and other benefits. The relief granted was treated as sui generis (one of its own kind, unique) and it was not taken into account for determining any allowance or benefit.
3. We give below briefly the course of negotiation and approach of various earlier Pay Commissions on the question of grant of interim relief.
4. The Second Pay Commission gave a report within a month’s time and recommended an Interim Relief of Rs. 5/-. The third pay Commission gave three instalments of Interim Relief on varying rates. After appoint of the 4th CPC in July, 1983, Government sanctioned (Vide Department of Expenditure O.M.No. 7(39)-E III/83 dated 2nd August, 1983) on their own initiative Interim Relief at varying rates of Rs. 50 and Rs. 100 per month. In March, 1985, 4th CPC submitted a report and granted a further interim relief at 10% of Basic pay subject to a minimum of Rs. 50 per month. Again before the setting up of the 5th CPC, the Government sanctioned Rs. 100 as interim Relief. As it was not considered adequate, the staff side of the National Council, JCM submitted a memorandum to the 5th CPC demanding additional interim relief. The Govt. vide their Department of Expenditure, Resolution No. 5(12)EIII/93 dated 12.01.1995 amended the terms of reference to enable the Commission to decide upon the additional interim relief. The 5th Central Pay Commission in their interim report submitted on 2 nd May, 1995, recommended Interim Relief equal to 10% of Basic Pay subject to a minimum of Rs. 100/-. The terms of reference of 6th CPC on the issue of Interim Relief was as under:-
“2.g. To examine desirability and need to sanction any interim relief till the time the recommendations of the Commission are made and accepted by the Government”
5. It has to be recalled that the Government did not initially refer the question of Interim Relief to the 5th CPC but when the Staff Side submitted their memorandum to the Commission on I.R., the Government had to amend the terms of reference and refer the issue to the Commission for their decision.
6. These go to establish the need for a relief in view of the erosion in the real value of wages, the need to fill the widening gap in wages when compared to outside rates and the fact that final recommendations of the 7 th Pay Commission are bound to revise the wage structure and above all the need to provide some relief to the employees who would retire before the Commission’s recommendations are finally submitted to the Government and accepted by them.
7. We give hereunder a table indicating the retail prices of the commodities which goes into the computation of minimum wage as per Dr.Ackroyd formula as on 1.1.2006 (quoted by the 6th CPC in their report. Page 53. Table 2.1`.1 Chapter 2.2.) and the actual retail price of those very commodities as on 1.1.2011. The percentage increase in the prices of each commodity is also given in the table. The average rise in prices was of the order of 174%, whehreas the Dearness allowance entitlement was only 51%.. The table clearly indicate the erosion in the real value of the wages.

Name of articles
Price as on 1.1.2006
    As on date
Dhall 4 varieties average
Raw vegetables
Green veg .
Other veg
Sugarjiggery Average

Average increase :
8. The need based minimum wage computed on the basis of Dr Ackroyd formula as on 1.1.2014 will be around Rs. 26,000 bringing about a gap of almost 12,000 at the level of an MTS. We shall submit the details thereof in our main memorandum.
9. The only Public Sector undertaking in which the wage agreement has been reached in 2013 is the Coal India Limited. As per the said agreement, the minimum wage at the lowest level of the worker as on 1.12014 is:
Basic Pay ——————————–Rs. 15, 712
Dearness allowance: ——-29.6%
Special allowance: ——— 4.0%
Special DA: ——————1.795%
Attendance bonus: ——-10%
Total: 49.395%————————– Rs. 7132.46
Total salary: —————————–Rs.22844.46
At the MTS level 22.844.46 x 130% —- Rs.29697.
10. As per the formula adopted by the 5th CPC, the minimum wage will work out to Rs. 22,857 as under:
A. Per Capita NNP at constant price for 2004-05 – Rs. 24,143
B. Per capita NNP at constant price for 2011-12 – Rs. 38,037
C. The increase registered over 8 years. – Rs. 13,894.
D. Percentage increase over 2004-05 – 57.54877.
E. Emoluments of an MTS as on 1.1.2014 – Rs. 14,000
F. 57.55% of Rs. 14,000. – Rs. 8,857.
G. Wage to be fixed in thecase of MTS as on1.1.14. – Rs. 22857.
From the above it is seen that Central Government employees presently have a very depressed salary structure. The final outcome of the deliberations of the 7 th CPC will become available only by 2016. It is, therefore, needed that the employees have to be compensated in the form of Interim Relief. In our opinion the Commission may, as has been done by the various earlier Pay Commissions, recommend atleast 25% of Pay in Pay Band plus Grade Pay as Interim Relief subject to a minimum of Rs. 4000/-. Incidentally we may point out that the grant of interim relief will enable the Government to spread out the financial outlay on account of wage revision over a period of more than three years.
We further urge that the Commission may kindly recommended Interim Relief at the above rate subject to minimum of Rs.2000/- to as pensioners and Gramin Dak Sevaks of Postal Department.
Secretary, Staff Side, National Council JCM.